Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aufgaben:Problem 8"

From Ferienserie MMP2
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
There are two things which I'm not sure about: whether in lemma 2 we can use Lebesgue (we need a discrete sequence of dominated functions, whereas h is a continuous variable; can we change h to 1/n and let \( n \rightarrow \infty \) instead of \( h \rightarrow 0 \) without any problem?) and how lemma 2 exactly justifies the passage with \( \color{red}{*} \)
 
There are two things which I'm not sure about: whether in lemma 2 we can use Lebesgue (we need a discrete sequence of dominated functions, whereas h is a continuous variable; can we change h to 1/n and let \( n \rightarrow \infty \) instead of \( h \rightarrow 0 \) without any problem?) and how lemma 2 exactly justifies the passage with \( \color{red}{*} \)
 +
Some derivative signs should be partial derivatives, but I guess it's not such a problem...
  
 
Best, Nick
 
Best, Nick

Revision as of 10:46, 29 December 2014

There are two things which I'm not sure about: whether in lemma 2 we can use Lebesgue (we need a discrete sequence of dominated functions, whereas h is a continuous variable; can we change h to 1/n and let \( n \rightarrow \infty \) instead of \( h \rightarrow 0 \) without any problem?) and how lemma 2 exactly justifies the passage with \( \color{red}{*} \) Some derivative signs should be partial derivatives, but I guess it's not such a problem...

Best, Nick