Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aufgaben:Problem 8"
From Ferienserie MMP2
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There are two things which I'm not sure about: whether in lemma 2 we can use Lebesgue (we need a discrete sequence of dominated functions, whereas h is a continuous variable; can we change h to 1/n and let \( n \rightarrow \infty \) instead of \( h \rightarrow 0 \) without any problem?) and how lemma 2 exactly justifies the passage with \( \color{red}{*} \) | There are two things which I'm not sure about: whether in lemma 2 we can use Lebesgue (we need a discrete sequence of dominated functions, whereas h is a continuous variable; can we change h to 1/n and let \( n \rightarrow \infty \) instead of \( h \rightarrow 0 \) without any problem?) and how lemma 2 exactly justifies the passage with \( \color{red}{*} \) | ||
+ | |||
Some derivative signs should be partial derivatives, but I guess it's not such a problem... | Some derivative signs should be partial derivatives, but I guess it's not such a problem... | ||
Best, Nick | Best, Nick |
Revision as of 10:47, 29 December 2014
There are two things which I'm not sure about: whether in lemma 2 we can use Lebesgue (we need a discrete sequence of dominated functions, whereas h is a continuous variable; can we change h to 1/n and let \( n \rightarrow \infty \) instead of \( h \rightarrow 0 \) without any problem?) and how lemma 2 exactly justifies the passage with \( \color{red}{*} \)
Some derivative signs should be partial derivatives, but I guess it's not such a problem...
Best, Nick