Difference between revisions of "User:Nik"
From Ferienserie MMP2
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 10|Problem 10]] | | [[Aufgaben:Problem 10|Problem 10]] | ||
− | | | + | | a by craven seems legit |
|- | |- | ||
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 11|Problem 11]] | | [[Aufgaben:Problem 11|Problem 11]] |
Revision as of 15:20, 30 July 2015
Niklaus Messerli nik@student.ethz.ch
Article | Check |
---|---|
Problem 1 | 1 |
Problem 2 | a-c):1, d):0 |
Problem 3 | d) Wieso müssen wir zeigen dass "\(\{L_g: g \in G\}\) is a group under composition"? Wir wissen doch schon, dass \(L: G \rightarrow \mathrm{Sym}G\) und dass \(G\) und \(\mathrm{Sym}G\) Gruppen sind. |
Problem 4 | 1 |
Problem 5 | 1 |
Problem 6 | 1 |
Problem 7 | Nachvollzogen |
Problem 8 | Hmja. \(C_2\) is constant b/c of symmetry reasons: exchange \(u\) and \(v\) |
Problem 9 | a): 1 |
Problem 10 | a by craven seems legit |
Problem 11 | 1 |
Problem 12 | bitch please |
Problem 13 | |
Problem 14 | |
Problem 15 | Nachvollzogen |