Difference between revisions of "User:Nik"

From Ferienserie MMP2
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(64 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
=== Foreword ===
+
Niklaus Messerli
−
I use \(Q\:/\:P\) instead of \(\widetilde{q}\:/\:\widetilde{p}\) because it's easier to write in Latex.  
+
nik@student.ethz.ch
−
=== Problem ===
+
−
Let
+
−
\( \Phi \in C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n) \)
+
−
have the property that the system
+
−
\( p_i = \frac{\partial}{\partial q_i} \Phi (q, Q \)
+
−
has a unique smooth solution
+
−
\( Q = Q(q,p) \).  
+
  
−
Define
+
{| class="wikitable"
−
\( P_i(q,p) = - \frac{\partial}{\partial Q_i} \Phi (q, Q) | _{Q= Q(q,p)} \)
+
!Article
−
 
+
!Check
−
Let \( \{\cdot,\cdot\} \) be the Poisson bracket, such that
+
|-
−
\( \{f,g\} = \sum_{j=1}^n \frac{\partial f}{\partial q_j} \frac{\partial g}{\partial p_j} - \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_j} \frac{\partial g}{\partial q_j} \)
+
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 1|Problem 1]]
−
 
+
| 1
−
Show that:
+
|-
−
 
+
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 2|Problem 2]]
−
i)
+
| a-c):1, d):0
−
\( \{Q_i(q,p), Q_j(q,p)\} = \{P_i (q,p), P_j(q,p)\} = 0 \)
+
|-
−
 
+
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 3|Problem 3]]
−
ii)
+
| d) Wieso müssen wir zeigen dass "\(\{L_g: g \in G\}\) is a group under composition"? Wir wissen doch schon, dass \(L: G \rightarrow \mathrm{Sym}G\) und dass \(G\) und \(\mathrm{Sym}G\) Gruppen sind.
−
\( \{Q_i(q,p), P_j(q,p)\} = \delta_{ij} \)
+
|-
−
 
+
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 4|Problem 4]]
−
 
+
| 1
−
=== Solution for i) ===
+
|-
−
=== Solution for ii) ===
+
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 5|Problem 5]]
 +
| 1
 +
|-
 +
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 6|Problem 6]]
 +
| 1
 +
|-
 +
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 7|Problem 7]]
 +
| 1
 +
|-
 +
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 8|Problem 8]]
 +
| 2
 +
|-
 +
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 9|Problem 9]]
 +
| 1
 +
|-
 +
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 10|Problem 10]]
 +
| a by craven seems legit
 +
|-
 +
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 11|Problem 11]]
 +
| 1
 +
|-
 +
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 12|Problem 12]]
 +
| bitch please
 +
|-
 +
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 13|Problem 13]]
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 14|Problem 14]]
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| [[Aufgaben:Problem 15|Problem 15]]
 +
| a): 1
 +
|-
 +
|}

Latest revision as of 14:13, 3 August 2015

Niklaus Messerli nik@student.ethz.ch

Article Check
Problem 1 1
Problem 2 a-c):1, d):0
Problem 3 d) Wieso müssen wir zeigen dass "\(\{L_g: g \in G\}\) is a group under composition"? Wir wissen doch schon, dass \(L: G \rightarrow \mathrm{Sym}G\) und dass \(G\) und \(\mathrm{Sym}G\) Gruppen sind.
Problem 4 1
Problem 5 1
Problem 6 1
Problem 7 1
Problem 8 2
Problem 9 1
Problem 10 a by craven seems legit
Problem 11 1
Problem 12 bitch please
Problem 13
Problem 14
Problem 15 a): 1
Retrieved from "http://ferienserie.ch/index.php?title=User:Nik&oldid=1618"