Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aufgaben:Problem 5"

From Ferienserie MMP2
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ilmanen's solution a bit more rigorous)
 
(added tensor index spacing)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Let \(A \in Z(\mathrm{Mat}_d(\mathbb{C}))\).
 
Let \(A \in Z(\mathrm{Mat}_d(\mathbb{C}))\).
  
Let \(E_{ij}\) be the \(d \times d\)-matrix with \((E_{ij})^k_l = \delta^{ij} \delta_{kl} \).
+
Let \(E_{ij}\) be the \(d \times d\)-matrix with \((E_{ij})^k{}_l = \delta^{ij} \delta_{kl} \).
  
 
Now, consider
 
Now, consider
$$(E_{ij} A)^k_l = (E_{ij})^k_m A^m_l = \delta^k_i \delta^j_m A^m_l = \delta^k_i A^j_l$$
+
$$(E_{ij} A)^k{}_l = (E_{ij})^k{}_m A^m{}_l = \delta^k{}_i \delta^j{}_m A^m{}_l = \delta^k{}_i A^j{}_l$$
 
but since \(A\) commutes with all compex \(d \times d\)-matrices, this is the same as
 
but since \(A\) commutes with all compex \(d \times d\)-matrices, this is the same as
$$(A E_{ij})^k_l = A^k_m (E_{ij})^m_l = A^k_m \delta^m_i \delta^j_l = \delta^j_l A^k_i$$
+
$$(A E_{ij})^k{}_l = A^k{}_m (E_{ij})^m{}_l = A^k{}_m \delta^m{}_i \delta^j{}_l = \delta^j{}_l A^k{}_i$$
  
 
Thus, we have that
 
Thus, we have that
$$\delta^k_i A^j_l = \delta^j_l A^k_i$$
+
$$\delta^k{}_i A^j{}_l = \delta^j{}_l A^k{}_i$$
 
As this holds for ''any'' \(1 \leq i,j,k,l \leq d\), we find:
 
As this holds for ''any'' \(1 \leq i,j,k,l \leq d\), we find:
$$\forall i \neq j: A^i_j = 0 \ \text{and} \ A^i_i = A^j_j$$
+
$$\forall i \neq j: A^i{}_j = 0 \ \text{and} \ A^i{}_i = A^j{}_j$$
 
which requires that \(A\) takes the form
 
which requires that \(A\) takes the form
 
$$A = \lambda \mathbb{I}_d$$
 
$$A = \lambda \mathbb{I}_d$$
 
for some \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\)
 
for some \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\)

Revision as of 14:02, 28 July 2015

Does anyone like tensor notation and wants to tell me whether this is formally correct?

--Nik (talk) 14:41, 28 July 2015 (CEST)

Ilmanen's solution in Einstein notation

Let \(A \in Z(\mathrm{Mat}_d(\mathbb{C}))\).

Let \(E_{ij}\) be the \(d \times d\)-matrix with \((E_{ij})^k{}_l = \delta^{ij} \delta_{kl} \).

Now, consider $$(E_{ij} A)^k{}_l = (E_{ij})^k{}_m A^m{}_l = \delta^k{}_i \delta^j{}_m A^m{}_l = \delta^k{}_i A^j{}_l$$ but since \(A\) commutes with all compex \(d \times d\)-matrices, this is the same as $$(A E_{ij})^k{}_l = A^k{}_m (E_{ij})^m{}_l = A^k{}_m \delta^m{}_i \delta^j{}_l = \delta^j{}_l A^k{}_i$$

Thus, we have that $$\delta^k{}_i A^j{}_l = \delta^j{}_l A^k{}_i$$ As this holds for any \(1 \leq i,j,k,l \leq d\), we find: $$\forall i \neq j: A^i{}_j = 0 \ \text{and} \ A^i{}_i = A^j{}_j$$ which requires that \(A\) takes the form $$A = \lambda \mathbb{I}_d$$ for some \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\)