Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aufgaben:Problem 14"

From Ferienserie MMP2
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "What should this "Pierre's lemma" be? It's clearly false: Let \( f = u + iv \) (with \( u \) and \( v \) real-valued) be any non-constant analytic functions; then u and v are...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 13:40, 31 December 2014

What should this "Pierre's lemma" be? It's clearly false: Let \( f = u + iv \) (with \( u \) and \( v \) real-valued) be any non-constant analytic functions; then u and v are not constant. Following "Pierre's lemma" they should be analytic, but we've showed in Ch. II.3 that any analytic real-valued function on a domain is constant, which is a contradiction. Cheers, the tables