Talk:Aufgaben:Problem 10

I don't think the proof for asymmitry was sufficient, it was only shown that we can pull out a minus sign from every sum, but the sum are disordered after the permutation and have be put back together. to show that we get back \(-d\omega\) and not something different

Carl (talk) 14:01, 18 June 2015 (CEST)

Typos in a)?

I'm not too confident with this subject so I won't change nothing but in the prop from page 77 the summation index should run up to n instead of p. Further I think we should continue to label the V_j: ...$$V_j(x^{j_i})$$... Thanks for the nice solution

Mario (talk) 15:55, 30 June 2015 (CEST)

I think your right on both, although you probably mean: \(V_i(x^{j_i})\)

Carl (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2015 (CEST)