Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Problem 8"

From Ferienserie MMP2
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 41: Line 41:
  
 
''Since we all like alternative versions here on the wiki, and I've encountered some confusion among my friends about the limit-thing we discussed above, I felt so free to put the alternative version in. Best, A.''
 
''Since we all like alternative versions here on the wiki, and I've encountered some confusion among my friends about the limit-thing we discussed above, I felt so free to put the alternative version in. Best, A.''
 +
 +
As for the alternative version: yes, it was a good idea, so each of us can choose the one she/he prefers.
 +
For \( L^1 \): it is, since \( e^{-x} \) is in Schwartz space, but I've added it to clarify (I didn't have this requirement in the formulation of the exercise class, but I guess Wiki is more reliable)

Revision as of 15:35, 12 January 2015


Concerning part a)

First thing: It is kind of unclear to me how \( \frac{d}{dx} ln(x) \vert_{x=1} = -x\dfrac{(\ln(1)-\ln(1-\frac{x}{k}))}{\frac{x}{k}} \).

Wouldn't it be much easier to just:

$$ \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \ln((1-\frac{x}{k})^{k}) = \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} k\ln(1-\frac{x}{k}) = \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\ln(1-\frac{x}{k})}{\frac{1}{k}} $$

and then use Bernoulli-L'Hopital to get:

$$ \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\ln(1-\frac{x}{k})}{\frac{1}{k}} = \lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\frac{x}{k^2}}{(\frac{x}{k} - 1) \frac{1}{k^2}} = -x $$

Second thing: Nevermind, confused myself...

Greetings A.

I didn't write that: I meant that the limit of the different quotient is the derivative. I was a bit inconsistent with the variable x (now it's fixed, I've used a y). If you prefer Bernoulli it's the same for me. Nick

Okay, I see what you meant now. I personally find it a bit confusing. But I guess it's a matter of taste.

A.

To Part b)

Question:

Since we had an whole exercise sheet on Lebesgue-convergence and i would assume they would ask of us to find an upper bound function g to prove that we're allowed to use that theorem. Why don't you do that? (It might be obvious but those just learning it by heart won't notice.)

Answer:

The upper bound function is for dominated convergence, not for monotone convergence. But I agree it is not so clearly stated, I'll fix it, thanks

Again to part b) As I remember (and according to Wikipedia http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satz_von_der_monotonen_Konvergenz) the function to which \(f_k\) converges, has to be \(\in L^1 \). That should maybe shown too?

Trubo-Warrior (talk) 12:20, 5 January 2015 (CET)


Since we all like alternative versions here on the wiki, and I've encountered some confusion among my friends about the limit-thing we discussed above, I felt so free to put the alternative version in. Best, A.

As for the alternative version: yes, it was a good idea, so each of us can choose the one she/he prefers. For \( L^1 \): it is, since \( e^{-x} \) is in Schwartz space, but I've added it to clarify (I didn't have this requirement in the formulation of the exercise class, but I guess Wiki is more reliable)