Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Problem 6"

From Ferienserie MMP2
Jump to: navigation, search
m (inserted task)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
Enjoy!
 
Enjoy!
 +
== Task ==
 +
Let \(G\) be a finite group. Let \(V\) be a finite dimensional complex vector space.
 +
 +
a) Let \(\rho: G \rightarrow GL(V)\) be an irreducible representation. Let \(A \in End(V)\) with
 +
\([A, \rho(g)] = 0, \; \forall g \in G \). Show that then \(A = \lambda \mathbb{I}, \; \lambda \in \mathbb{C}\).
 +
 +
b) Let \(\rho: G \rightarrow GL(V)\) be unitary w.r.t. \(\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle \) on \(V\). Assume that it holds
 +
$$A \in End(V), [A, \rho(g)] = 0 \; \forall g \in G \Rightarrow A = \lambda \mathbb{I}, \; \lambda \in \mathbb{C}.$$
 +
Show that then \(\rho\) is irreducible.
 +
  
 
== Problem 6 (Textbook) ==
 
== Problem 6 (Textbook) ==

Revision as of 19:31, 29 June 2015

Follow the link! [1]

An independently written, second solution is here: [2]

Enjoy!

Task

Let \(G\) be a finite group. Let \(V\) be a finite dimensional complex vector space.

a) Let \(\rho: G \rightarrow GL(V)\) be an irreducible representation. Let \(A \in End(V)\) with \([A, \rho(g)] = 0, \; \forall g \in G \). Show that then \(A = \lambda \mathbb{I}, \; \lambda \in \mathbb{C}\).

b) Let \(\rho: G \rightarrow GL(V)\) be unitary w.r.t. \(\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle \) on \(V\). Assume that it holds $$A \in End(V), [A, \rho(g)] = 0 \; \forall g \in G \Rightarrow A = \lambda \mathbb{I}, \; \lambda \in \mathbb{C}.$$ Show that then \(\rho\) is irreducible.


Problem 6 (Textbook)

a

From \([A, \rho(g)] = 0 ~ \forall g \) it follows that \(Ker(A)\) is an invariant subspace of \(V\) and since the representation is irreducible that \(A=0=0\cdot 1\) or \(A\) is an isomorphism. Suppose the second case: \(A\) has a eigen value \(\lambda \in \mathbb{C}\), therefor \(A-\lambda \cdot 1\) is not injective. But it holds too that \([A-\lambda \cdot 1, \rho(g)] = 0 ~ \forall g\), and since \(Ker(A) \neq 0\) it follows that \(A - \lambda \cdot 1 = 0 \)

\(\blacksquare\)


b

Let \(\rho\) be unitary but reducible and let \(U\) be a not trivial subspace. If \(u \in U, u^{\perp} \in U^{\perp}\) it holds that \( 0 = (\rho(g)u,u^{\perp}) = (u, \rho(g^{-1}u^{\perp}) ~ \forall g\) and therefor \(U^{\perp}\) is invariant too. Let \(A\) be the orthogonal projection on \(U\). Then it holds that \(A \neq \lambda \cdot 1\) (since \(U\) is not trivial), but \([A,\rho(g)]v = [A,\rho(g)](u + u^{\perp}) = A(\rho(g)u + \rho(g)u^{\perp}) - \rho(g)u = 0 ~ \forall g \).

\(\blacksquare\)