Difference between revisions of "Aufgaben:Problem 1"

From Ferienserie MMP2
Jump to: navigation, search
(Part b))
Line 31: Line 31:
 
===Proof===
 
===Proof===
  
At first, we prove a little Lemma:  
+
We write \( z = x + iy \) and \( f(x + iy) = u(x,y) + i v(x,y) \) where \( u, v \) are real valued functions. By assumption we get:
  
'''Pierre's Lemma:''' If \( f = u + iv \) is a holomorphic function then \( u, v \) are meromorphic.
+
$$ \forall y \in \left[ 0, 1 \right] : v(1, y) = v(0, y) $$
  
\( \color{red}{So \: beautiful! \: See \: discussion} \)
+
$$ \forall x \in \left[ 0, 1 \right] : v(x, 0) = v(x, 1) $$
  
''Proof of Lemma:''
+
Since \( f \) is holomorphic, \( v \) is a harmonic function. We can harmonically and doubly-periodically continue \( v \) to \( v : \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \). Furthermore \( v(Q) = v(\mathbb{C}) \) and since \( Q \) is compact we have \( \forall z \in \mathbb{C} \left| v (z) \right| \leq M \) for some \( M \in \mathbb{R} \). We now apply Liouville's theorem for harmonic functions and get \( v \equiv const \). 
  
If \( a, b \in \mathbb{R} \smallsetminus \{ 0 \} \), then \( a \) and \( b i \) are linearly independent. ( \( \mathbb{C} \) is a two-dimensional \( \mathbb{R} \)-vectorspace with basis \( 1 \) and \( i \). ) If \( v \) is zero then \( f = u \) is constant (see critic in discussion), if \( u = 0 \) then \( v \) is meromorphic anyway and yay. \( \square \)
+
From the Cauchy-Riemann equations it follows immediately that also \( u \) has to be constant. \( \square \)
  
Now we can start with the main proof. We write \( z = x + iy \) and \( f(x + iy) = u(x,y) + i v(x,y) \) where \( u, v \) are real valued functions. By assumption we get:
+
'''Liouville's theorem for harmonic functions:''' Let \( \lambda : \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) be a harmonic function and \( \forall z \in \mathbb{C} \left| \lambda (z) \right| \leq M \) for some \( M \in \mathbb{R} \). Then \( \lambda \) is constant.  
  
$$ \forall y \in \left[ 0, 1 \right] : v(1, y) = v(0, y) $$
+
''Proof.''
  
$$ \forall x \in \left[ 0, 1 \right] : v(x, 0) = v(x, 1) $$
+
In ''Complex Analysis'' by Th. Gamelin, Chapter 3, Section 4, we have the following property of a harmonic function \( \lambda \):
  
Therefore
+
Let \( B_r(z_0) \) be the ball of radius \( r \) around \( z_0 \in \mathbb{C} \). Then:
$$\forall z\in [0,i]: v(z+1)=v(z)$$
+
$$\forall z\in[0,1] : v(z+i)=v(z)$$
+
  
And we see that v is doubly-periodic on \(Q\). Pierre's Lemma implies that \(u\) and \(v\) are meromorphic. Because \(f\) has no poles on \(Q\), \(u\) and \(v\) don't have either. Therefore, \(u\) and \(v\) are holomorphic on \(Q\).
+
$$ \lambda (z_0) = \int_{0}^{2\pi} \lambda ( z_0 + re^{i\theta} ) \frac{d\theta}{2\pi} $$
  
 
+
(Still working on that...)
We thus see that \( v \) can be doubly-periodic, analytically continued on \(\mathbb{C}\), so that it's an elliptic function with respect to the lattice \( \Omega = \{ m + in : m, n \in \mathbb{Z} \} \).  
+
 
+
We've shown in part a) that a elliptic, holomorphic function has to be constant. Thus \( v \) is constant.  
+
 
+
From the Cauchy-Riemann equations it follows immediately that also \( u \) has to be constant. \( \square \)
+

Revision as of 02:43, 1 January 2015

Part a)

Prove that, if \(f\) is an elliptic function, then \(f\) is constant if and only if \(f\) has no poles.

Solution part a)

Definition (elliptic function): A function \(f\) is called elliptic if it has the following two properties:

(a) \(f\) is doubly periodic.

(b) \(f\) is meromorphic (its only singularities in the finite plane are poles).

(Taken from Apostol, 1.4)

Liouville's theorem: If \(f\) is holomorph on \( \mathbb{C} \) and bounded, then \(f\) is constant.


To prove: Let \(f\) be an elliptic function: \(f\) is constant \(\Leftrightarrow\) \(f\) has no poles.

\( "\Rightarrow" \) Let \(f\) be constant on \( \mathbb{C} \) \( \rightarrow f\) has no poles.

\( "\Leftarrow" \) Let \(P\) be the fundamental region to \(f\), where \(f\) is elliptic and has no poles.

\( f(\mathbb{C}) = f(P) \) is compact and thus bounded. Because \(f\) is both holomorph and bounded on \(\mathbb{C}\), Liouville's theorem tells us that \(f\) has to be a constant function. \(\square\)


Part b)

\( \vdash: \) Let \( Q = \left[ 0, 1\right] \times \left[ 0, 1 \right] \subset \mathbb{C} \) be the unit square, and let \( f \) be a holomorphic function on a neighborhood of \( Q \). Suppose further that \( f( z + i) - f(z) \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} \) for any \( z \in \left[ 0, 1 \right] \) and \( f( z + 1) - f(z) \in \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} \) for any \( z \in \left[ 0, i \right] \). Then \(f\) is constant.

Proof

We write \( z = x + iy \) and \( f(x + iy) = u(x,y) + i v(x,y) \) where \( u, v \) are real valued functions. By assumption we get:

$$ \forall y \in \left[ 0, 1 \right] : v(1, y) = v(0, y) $$

$$ \forall x \in \left[ 0, 1 \right] : v(x, 0) = v(x, 1) $$

Since \( f \) is holomorphic, \( v \) is a harmonic function. We can harmonically and doubly-periodically continue \( v \) to \( v : \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \). Furthermore \( v(Q) = v(\mathbb{C}) \) and since \( Q \) is compact we have \( \forall z \in \mathbb{C} \left| v (z) \right| \leq M \) for some \( M \in \mathbb{R} \). We now apply Liouville's theorem for harmonic functions and get \( v \equiv const \).

From the Cauchy-Riemann equations it follows immediately that also \( u \) has to be constant. \( \square \)

Liouville's theorem for harmonic functions: Let \( \lambda : \mathbb{C} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) be a harmonic function and \( \forall z \in \mathbb{C} \left| \lambda (z) \right| \leq M \) for some \( M \in \mathbb{R} \). Then \( \lambda \) is constant.

Proof.

In Complex Analysis by Th. Gamelin, Chapter 3, Section 4, we have the following property of a harmonic function \( \lambda \):

Let \( B_r(z_0) \) be the ball of radius \( r \) around \( z_0 \in \mathbb{C} \). Then:

$$ \lambda (z_0) = \int_{0}^{2\pi} \lambda ( z_0 + re^{i\theta} ) \frac{d\theta}{2\pi} $$

(Still working on that...)